Economics and Stability of a Marriage and Family Therapist
Abstract
Previous studies accept identified the negative impacts of an increase in the proportion of a married woman's income to the couple's combined income, as well every bit of the gap in housework/childcare, on the stability of a marriage, increasing the likelihood of divorce. However, the intrahousehold mechanism is nevertheless inconclusive in terms of this event. In the present study, nosotros investigated a potential culling machinery, following the gender identity framework and the collective model and using longitudinal survey data from 1993 to 2015 from the Japanese Panel Survey of Consumers (JPSC). The findings showed that an increase in a wife's share of the couple income increased her relative bargaining ability and had a significant influence on intrahousehold reallocations of income/time. These intrahousehold reallocations, in plough, had a negative touch on on the stability of the marriage. In couples with high-income wives, the husbands transferred their incomes to their wives, and the wives undertook the majority of the housework. In other words, a higher housework burden among wives was associated with regular income transfers from husbands to wives. Meanwhile, despite increases in wives' income shares, both husbands and wives contributed to the family through reallocations of income/time in order to maintain matrimony stability.
Notes
-
According to the Japanese Ministry of Wellness, Labour, and Welfare (2017), there were 11.29 million dual-income couples and half dozen.64 million couples with the wife outside the workforce in 2016.
-
The data collected from 1993 to 2015 are available for enquiry.
-
The total income is normalized as 1; therefore, the summation of private-purpose and shared incomes within families is 1.
-
The JPSC collects the information on private expenditures for wives and husbands.
-
For example, when an individual'southward weekly private time is 100.8 h, and then the private fourth dimension expenditure is 0.6, obtained from 100.eight/168.
-
JPSC from 1993 to 2015.
References
-
Akerlof, G. A., & Kranton, R. E. (2000). Economics and identity. The Quarterly Periodical of Economics, 115(iii), 715–753.
-
Attanasio, O., & Lechene, 5. (2002). Tests of income pooling in household decisions. Review of economic dynamics, 5(4), 720–748.
-
Baxter, J., & Tai, T.−o. (2016). Inequalities in Unpaid Work: A Cantankerous-National Comparison. In Handbook on Well-Beingness of Working Women (pp. 653–671). Heidelberg: Springer.
-
Bertrand, M., Kamenica, E., & Pan, J. (2015). Gender identity and relative income within households. The Quarterly Periodical of Economics, 130(two), 571–614.
-
Browning, M., Bourguignon, F., Chiappori, P. A., & Lechene, V. (1994). Income and outcomes-a structrual model of intrahousehold allocation. Journal of Political Economic system, 102, 1067–1096.
-
Browning, M., Chiappori, P. A., & Lewbel, A. (2013). Estimating consumption economies of scale, developed equivalence scales, and household bargaining power. Review of Economic Studies, fourscore, 1267–1303.
-
Chiappori, P. A. (1988). Rational household labor supply. Econometrica, 56(1), 63–90.
-
Chiappori, P. A. (1992). Collective labor supply and welfare. Periodical of Political Economy, 100(3), 437–467.
-
Chiappori, P. A., Fortin, B., & Lacroix, 1000. (2002). Marriage market place, divorce legislation, and household labor supply. Periodical of Political Economy, 110, 37–72.
-
Christensen, L. R., Jorgenson, D. W., & Lau, 50. J. (1975). Transcendental logarithmic utility functions. American Economic Review, 65, 367–383.
-
Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., Lewbel, A., & Vermeulen, F. (2015). Sharing rule identification for general collective consumption models. Econometrica, 83, 2001–2041.
-
Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., & Vermeulen, F. (2012). Married with children: a collective labor supply model with detailed time use and intrahousehold expenditure data. American Economic Review, 102, 3377–3405.
-
Constantin, A., & Voicu, Thousand. (2015). Attitudes towards gender roles in cantankerous-cultural surveys: content validity and cross-cultural measurement invariance. Social Indicators Enquiry, 123(3), 733–751.
-
Couprie, H. (2007). Time allocation within the family: welfare implications of life in a couple. Economic Journal, 117, 287–305.
-
Deaton, A., & Muellbauer, J. (1980). Economics and consumer behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Fenstermaker Berk, S. (1985). The gender factory: The apportionment of work in American households. New York: Plenum.
-
Fu, R., & Noguchi, H. (2018). Does the positive relationship between wellness and marriage reverberate protection or selection? Evidence from eye-anile and elderly Japanese. Review of Economics of the Household, xvi(iv), 1003–1016.
-
Fu, R., Noguchi, H., Tachikawa, H., Aiba, 1000., Nakamine, S., Kawamura, A., et al. (2017). Relation between social network and psychological distress among middle-aged adults in Japan: evidence from a national longitudinal survey. Social Science & Medicine, 175, 58–65.
-
González-Val, R., & Marcén, Grand. (2018). Unemployment, marriage and divorce. Practical Economics, 50(13), 1495–1508.
-
Light-green, W. H. (2012). Econometric analysis (7th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
-
Haddad, G. One thousand. (2015). Gender ratio, divorce rate, and intra-household collective decision process: evidence from iranian urban households labor supply with non-participation. Empirical Economics, 48(4), 1365–1394.
-
Hansen, H. T. (2005). Unemployment and marital dissolution: a panel information study of Norway. European Sociological Review, 21(2), 135–148.
-
Hayashi, F. (1995). Is the Japanese extended family unit altruistically linked—a examination based on engel curves. Journal of Political Economic system, 103(iii), 661–674.
-
Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. Eastward. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), nineteen–51.
-
Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Jensen, P., & Smith, N. (1990). Unemployment and marital dissolution. Periodical of Population Economic science, 3(three), 215–229.
-
Killewald, A. (2016). Money, work, and marital stability: assessing modify in the gendered determinants of divorce. American Sociological Review, 81(four), 696–719.
-
Knowles, J. A. (2013). Why are married men working so much? An aggregate assay of intra-household bargaining and labour supply. Review of Economic Studies, fourscore(three), 1055–1085.
-
Lise, J., & Seitz, S. (2011). Consumption inequality and intra-household allocations. Review of Economic Studies, 78, 328–355.
-
Lise, J., & Yamada, K. (2018). Household sharing and commitment: evidence from panel data on individual expenditures and time use. The Review of Economic Studies, 86(5), 2184–2219.
-
Ma, X., & Piao, 10. (2019). The impact of intra-household bargaining power on happiness of married women: testify from Japan. Periodical of Happiness Studies, twenty(6), 1775–1806.
-
Ministry of health, labor and welfare. (2009). Statistics on divorce. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/jinkou/suikei19/alphabetize.html. Accessed May 14th, 2020.
-
Ministry building of health, labor and welfare. (2017). The number of dual-earner families. https://world wide web.mhlw.go.jp/wp/hakusyo/kousei/17/backdata/01-01-02-eleven.html. Accessed Nov 4th, 2019.
-
Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. (2019). Consumer price index. https://www.eastward-stat.go.jp/stat-search/files?page=1&layout=datalist&toukei=00200573&tstat=000001084976&cycle=0&tclass1=000001085995&tclass2=000001085937. Accessed on April 25th, 2019.
-
OECD (2015) https://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=6816. Accessed on June 22, 2020.
-
Phipps, South. A., & Burton, P. S. (1998). What's mine is yours? The influence of male and female incomes on patterns of household expenditure. Economica, 65(260), 599–613.
-
Piao, 10. (2017). Sweets or alcohol? The gender battle inside Japanese families. Economics Bulletin, 37(1), 190–203.
-
Piotrowski, M., Yoshida, A., Johnson, L., & Wolford, R. (2019). Gender role attitudes: an examination of cohort effects in Japan. Journal of Marriage and Family.
-
Poortman, A. R. (2005). How work affects divorce: the mediating office of financial and fourth dimension pressures. Journal of Family Bug, 26(ii), 168–195.
-
Sayer, L. C., England, P., Allison, P. D., & Kangas, N. (2011). She left, he left: How employment and satisfaction touch women's and men'south decisions to leave marriages. American Journal of Sociology, 116(6), 1982–2018.
-
Shiu, J.-Fifty., & Tang, M.-C. (2017). A capable wife: couple's joint decisions on labor supply and family chores. Empirical Economics, 53(2), 827–851.
-
Tsutsui, J. (2013). Gender segregation of housework. In Due south. Tanaka (Ed.), A quantitative moving-picture show of contemporary Japanese families (pp. 123–146). Sendai Miyagi: Tohoku University Printing. (in Japanese).
-
Tumin, D., & Qian, Z. (2017). Unemployment and the transition from separation to divorce. Journal of Family Problems, 38(ten), 1389–1413.
-
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & society, 1(ii), 125–151.
-
Wooldridge, J. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Console Data (2nd ed.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
-
Yamamura, E., & Tsutsui, Y. (2019). Spousal historic period gap and identity and their bear on on the allocation of housework. Empirical Economics, 1–25.
Acknowledgement
I would like to thank Naohito Abe, Daiji Kawaguchi, Emiko Usui, Xinxin Ma and seminar and conferences participants for their useful discussion and comments. I would like to thank the two anonymous referees and the Editor.
Author information
Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Annotation
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
See Tables v, 6, 7 and 8.
About this article
Cite this commodity
Piao, X. Spousal relationship Stability and Private Versus Shared Expenditures Inside Families: Evidence from Japanese Families. Soc Indic Res 153, 533–559 (2021). https://doi.org/ten.1007/s11205-020-02498-two
-
Accustomed:
-
Published:
-
Consequence Date:
-
DOI : https://doi.org/ten.1007/s11205-020-02498-2
Keywords
- Intrahousehold allocation
- Marriage stability
- Nippon
- Longitudinal information
- Gender identity
JEL Classification
- D13
- J12
- J16
Source: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11205-020-02498-2?error=cookies_not_supported&code=635a5577-3638-4f08-87b8-57283cb56ce1
0 Response to "Economics and Stability of a Marriage and Family Therapist"
Post a Comment